A couple days ago I linked to an Axis study that set out to prove that the cost of IP surveillance is now less expensive than its analog counterpart.
Now there is a healthy debate over at IP Video Market Info about the validity of this study. Check it out:
Debating Axis’s IP vs Analog Cost Comparison
Some of the major sticking points are:
- The Axis’s study assumes that no surveillance equipment is currently being used (i.e., ‘greenfield’). A majority of organizations buying surveillance systems already have some cameras and cabling installed and a large portion of that infrastructure can and regularly is reused.
- For any given feature set, IP cameras always cost significantly more than analog. While a DVR costs more than PC plus